An interesting post by Richard Denison suggesting that in the so-called 2.0 environment, management must change it's ways. In particular, he notes:
It strikes me, that to be a successful 2.0 manager, you need to:
- know when to sit and watch
- know when to let things run their course and for how long
- know when to intervene (or engage) and how to do that without alienating everyone
- realise that management and control are not the same thing … relinquishing control can be a good management technique … and …
- be humble enough to accept that there may be more than one way to get things done and our way might not suit everyone’s needs.
Well, this is rather interesting. As noted by one commentor, these rules seem to reflect coaching, and also leadership, versus management. After all, in a world where the employee knows more than the 'boss' about customers/processes/opportunities, we have to find ways to support and encourage sharing and cooperation - shotgun weddings don't work here!
What can we learn from web2.0 and social networking? Learning how to build relationships, nurture conversations and grow communities online can also spill over into 'real life' where the manager.as.coach can do a better job of providing resources, feedback, goals and constructive advice, and standing back when necessary.
2 comments:
I think Gary Hamel makes a good link between web 2.0 and management 2.0 in The Future of Management:
http://social-business.blogspot.com/2008/04/management-20.html
Published a response to your views on the future of social networking on my blog James, with a review of an excellent book in this field. You may be interested.
I'm currently drafting out the CIPD report on this topic and your comment has made me think quite a bit about its future. A number of us had a good discussion on teh topic at the British Academy of Management confernce yesterday, but it is clear to me that not too many HR academics know about it
Post a Comment